Activities and Learning Results of Islamic Education Through the Implementation of Cooperative Type Models Gallery Walk at Elementary School

Authors

  • Wirman Hanizon STIT Ahlussunnah Bukittinggi, Indonesia
  • Fitriani Fitriani Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia
  • Helena Helena STAI Yayasan Tarbiyah Islamiyah (YASTIS) Lubuk Bagalung Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58485/jie.v1i1.91

Keywords:

Activities, Islamic learning, gallery walk

Abstract

The condition of learning in elementary schools, especially Islamic Education currently still uses conventional learning models (lecture method). In learning, students only become objects, so it does not encourage students' potential to develop. PAI learning using the Cooperative Type Learning Model Gallery Walk in class V elementary school is very good to apply. This aims to ensure that students develop activity and creativity in the classroom, have an attitude of respect for other people and appreciate the work of others, learn to solve certain problems, learn to understand group diversity, and be able to socialize in group environments and social life. The approach used is the approach qualitative. Research data This is in the form of information about the process and data on the results of actions obtained from observations, interview results, and final tests. The data source is the process of implementing the Type Cooperative Learning Model Gallery Walk in learning Islamic Education in class V at Elementary School 09 Behind Balok Bukittinggi. The research subjects were teachers (observers), researchers (practitioners), and 26 class V students. Data analysis was carried out using a data analysis model. Research result shows that learning uses a cooperative learning model Gallery Walk is very well implemented to improve student learning outcomes. The research results obtained in the first cycle of the first meeting showed that student activity was 69.89%, in the second meeting it increased to 73.10%, and in the second cycle of the first meeting, it became 86.02%. Meanwhile, the learning outcomes in cycle I, meeting I, were 68.46%, meeting II was 76.15% and in cycle II, meeting I was 98.46%. This is proof of the success of the research carried out at elementary school 09 Behind Balok Bukittinggi.

References

Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336

Arnold, L., & Norton, L. (2021). Problematizing pedagogical action research in formal teaching courses and academic development: a collaborative autoethnography. Educational Action Research, 29(2), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1746373

Bebko, J. M., Burke, L., Craven, J., & Sarlo, N. (2010). The Importance of Motor Activity in Sensorimotor Development: A Perspective from Children with Physical Handicaps. Human Development, 35(4), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1159/000277170

Bin Mukhtar, Z., Norazimah binti Mukhtar, & Azwan bin Harun. (2022). The Concept of Pedagogy in the Quran. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary, 1(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.38035/ijam.v1i1.40

Bou, M., & Sales, A. (2022). Shared knowledge construction in participatory action research: perceptions of researchers and educational community. Educational Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2022.2111695

Casey, A., & Goodyear, V. A. (2015). Can Cooperative Learning Achieve the Four Learning Outcomes of Physical Education? A Review of Literature. Quest, 67(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2014.984733

Ceven McNally, J. (2016). Learning from one’s teaching: New science teachers analyzing their practice through classroom observation cycles. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 473–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21253

Cornford, I. R. (2002). Reflective teaching: Empirical research findings and some implications for teacher education. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 54(2), 235. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820200200196

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Duives, D. C., Daamen, W., & Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2013). State-of-the-art crowd motion simulation models. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 37, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.02.005

Getha-Eby, T. J., Beery, T., Xu, Y., & O’Brien, B. A. (2014). Meaningful learning: Theoretical support for concept-based teaching. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(9), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140820-04

Hitt, D. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2016). Systematic Review of Key Leader Practices Found to Influence Student Achievement: A Unified Framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315614911

Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in the teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712

Mardiana, P. D., Ikhsan, M., & Analka, A. (2021). The Role of Islamic Education Teachers in the Middle of Society in Religious Activities. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research of Higher Education, 4(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijmurhica.v4i1.151

Maruyama, S., Dineva, E., Spencer, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2014). Change occurs when the body meets environment: A review of the embodied nature of development. Japanese Psychological Research, 56(4), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12065

Niroula, A., & Vihinen, M. (2016). Variation Interpretation Predictors: Principles, Types, Performance, and Choice. Human Mutation, 37(6), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22987

Nopriza, C., Yulianti, F., Adel, S., & Susanti, H. (2021). Eight Skills of Islamic Religious Education Teachers in Improving Student Learning Outcomes in Junior High School. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research of Higher Education, 4(2), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijmurhica.v4i2.155

Saihu, M. (2022). Eksistensi Manusia sebagai Khalifah dan Implementasinya dalam Pendidikan Islam. Andragogi: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36671/andragogi.v4i02.296

Setiawan Z, R. (2023). The Effect of Gallery Walk Cooperative Learning Model on Learning Outcomes in Economics Lessons. Journal of Social Knowledge Education (JSKE), 4(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.37251/jske.v4i1.421

Somech, A., & Bogler, R. (2019). The pressure to go above and beyond the call of duty: Understanding the phenomenon of citizenship pressure among teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.014

Su, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12088

Young, M., & Lee Warren, D. (2011). Encouraging the development of critical thinking skills in the introductory accounting courses using the challenge problem approach. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(4), 859–881. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50065

Downloads

Published

2022-02-06 — Updated on 2022-04-28

How to Cite

Hanizon, W., Fitriani, F., & Helena, H. (2022). Activities and Learning Results of Islamic Education Through the Implementation of Cooperative Type Models Gallery Walk at Elementary School. Ahlussunnah: Journal of Islamic Education, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.58485/jie.v1i1.91

Issue

Section

Articles