Comparative Analysis of Constructivist, Quantum, and Contextual Learning Models in Modern Education

Authors

  • Siti Nazwa Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Azmi Abdul Aziz Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Dadang Sutioso Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Erinsa Eka Agustina Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia
  • Abdul Azis Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58485/elrusyd.v11i1.703

Keywords:

Constructivism model, quantum teaching, contextual learning, active learning, learning innovation

Abstract

This article aims to examine and analyze three innovative learning models, namely the constructivism model, the quantum teaching model, and the contextual teaching and learning (CTL) model in the learning process. This study employs a library research method by collecting and analyzing various theoretical sources and relevant empirical research findings. The results reveal that each of the three learning models possesses distinct characteristics, implementation stages, as well as advantages and limitations. The constructivism model positions students as active subjects who independently construct knowledge through stages of apperception, exploration, concept discussion, and application. The quantum teaching model, developed by Bobbi DePorter, applies the TANDUR framework (Tumbuhkan, Alami, Namai, Demonstrasikan, Ulangi, Rayakan) to create enjoyable, meaningful learning experiences that optimally empower students' potential. Meanwhile, the contextual learning model emphasizes the relevance of subject matter to students' real-life contexts through five essential learning forms: relating, experiencing, applying, cooperating, and transferring knowledge. The implications of this study affirm that the successful application of all three models is greatly influenced by student readiness, teachers' facilitation competence, availability of facilities and infrastructure, and the compatibility of instructional material characteristics. Therefore, selecting the appropriate and contextual learning model is paramount in realizing effective, active, and meaningful learning for students in the modern era.

References

Al-Tabany, T. I. B. (2014). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, progresif, dan Kontekstual kurikulum 2013. In Surabaya: Kencana,. Prenadamedia Group.

Albina, M., Safi’i, A., Gunawan, M. A., Wibowo, M. T., Sitepu, N. A. S., & Ardiyanti, R. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Di Abad Ke 21. Warta Dharmawangsa, 16(4), 939–955. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v16i4.2446

Arifin, M., Umar, M., & Siregar, A. H. (2024). Model-Model Pembelajaran di Era 4 . 0 dan Disrupsi dalam Implementasi. Journal on Education, 06(02), 11110–11119.

Arikunto, S. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. In Rake Sarasin (Issue March). Bumi Aksara.

Asril, Z., Syafril, S., Engkizar, & Arifin, Z. (2023). Advancing Educational Practices: Implementation and Impact of Virtual Reality in Islamic Religious Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v9i2.20567

Astiti, N. N. S., Lasmawan, I. W., & Haris, I. A. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning Dan Quantum Teaching Terhadap Motivasi Berprestasi Dan Hasil Belajar Ips Siswa Kelas Vii Smp Negeri 1 Kediri. Ekuitas: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 6(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.23887/ekuitas.v6i1.14241

Baharuddin, B., & Wahyuni, E. N. (2015). Belajar dan pembelajaran (teori belajar dan pembelajaran) (Issue August). Ar-Ruzz Media.

Chailani, M. I., Fahrub, A. W., & Febyola, F. F. (2025). Integrasi Teori Motivasi dalam Pembelajaran PAI: Strategi Meningkatkan Keterlibatan Belajar Peserta Didik Abad 21. Tut Wuri Handayani : Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.59086/jkip.v4i1.737

Engkizar, E., Jaafar, A., Alias, M., Guspita, B., & Albizar, R. (2025). Utilisation of Artificial Intelligence in Qur’anic Learning: Innovation or Threat? Journal of Quranic Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 1–17. https://joqer.intischolar.id/index.php/joqer/index

Engkizar, E., Jaafar, A., Hamzah, M. I., Syafril, S., Oktavia, G., Febriani, A., & Albizar, A. (2026). Tartil Method as an Effective Strategy for Transforming Students’ Positive Attitudes in Learning the Qur’an. Journal of Quranic Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 50–63. https://joqer.intischolar.id/index.php/joqer/article/view/21

Harefa, E., Patalatu, J. S., Azizah, N., Yusufi, A., & Husnita, L. (2024). Buku Ajar Teori Belajar Dan. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Hasudungan, A. N. (2022). Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19: Sebuah Tinjauan. Jurnal DinamikA, 3(2), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.18326/dinamika.v3i2.112-126

Haziyah, S. F., Nugraheni, N., & Ambastari, S. (2024). Penerapan Model Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Bahasa Indonesia pada Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(3), 1875–1884. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i3.7495

Helmiati. (2012). Model Pembelajaran. Aswaja Pressindo.

Japa, I. G. N. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Kuantum Berorientasi Pemecahan Masalah dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Terhadap Penalaran Mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 20(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v20i12014p9-16

Khasanah, U., Suparman, M. A., & Wibawa, B. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berbicara Anak Usia Dini Menggunakan Big Book: Konsep dan Aplikasinya. In Kencana. Kencana. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=FXR8EAAAQBAJ&newbks=0&lpg

Luvitasari, V., S, N., & Nirwana, H. (2025). Strategi Model Pembelajaran Efektif Abad 21 : Kajian Konsep Dan Penerapan Project-Based Contextual Teaching and Learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Mahasiswa, 3(6), 664–672. https://doi.org/10.61722/jipm.v3i6.1716

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Penelitian Kualitatif: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. In Jurnal EQUILIBRIUM (40th ed., Vol. 5, Issue January). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Musbaing. (2024). Peran Pembelajaran PAI dalam Membangun Karakter Islami (Sebuah Kajian Literatur ) Pendahuluan. Jurnal Pendidikan Refleksi, 13(3), 405–412. https://p3i.my.id/index.php/refleksi/article/view/395

Mustafa, A., Khoirunisa, N., Giling, M., & Parta, M. H. (2026). Toward an Integrative Ethical Governance Model: Quranic and Hadith Perspectives in the 21st Century. Multidisciplinary Journal of Thought and Research, 2(1), 14–24. https://mujoter.intischolar.id/index.php/mujoter/article/view/51

Ningsih, M. P., Sugiyanti, S., & Ariyanto, L. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Quantum Learning dan Active Learning Berbantu Aplikasi Quizizz terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas XI. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(5), 366–374. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v3i5.7732

Rijali, A. (2018). Analisis data kualitatif. Analisis data kualitatif,. Analisis Data Kualitatif, 9(33), 180. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228075212.pdf

Rusman. (2021a). Model-model belajar (Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru). In Jakarta: Raja Farindo Persada (Vol. 1). Rajawali Pers. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=R1FAcZYAAAAJ&citation_for_view=R1FAcZYAAAAJ:9yKSN-GCB0IC

Sastradiharja, E. J., Siskandar, S., & Khoiri, I. (2020). Model Pembelajaran CTL (Contextual Teaching And Learning) Pada Mata Pelajaran PAI dan Implementasinya di SMP Islam Asysyakirin Pinang Kota Tangerang. In Jurnal Statement : Media Informasi Sosial dan Pendidikan (Vol. 10, Issue 1). Institut PTIQ. https://doi.org/10.56745/js.v10i1.19

Seminikhyna, N. M., & Lutsenko, O. V. (2024). the Role of Education in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Innovate Pedagogy, 8(77), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6085/2024/77.44

Shoimin, A. (2014). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Dalam Kurikulum 2013. In Ar-Ruzz Media (Issue Yogyakarta). Ar-Ruzz Media. https://www.bacaebook.net/2021/01/68-model-pembelajaran-inovatif-dalam.html?m=1

Sonia, T., Alberida, H., Arsih, F., & Selaras, G. H. (2025). Tut Wuri Handayani : Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Integrasi Teori Motivasi dalam Pembelajaran PAI : Strategi Meningkatkan Ketertiban Belajar Peserta Didik Abad 21. Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 26–37.

Suryana, E., Aprina, M. P., & Harto, K. (2022). Teori Konstruktivistik dan Implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(7), 2070–2080. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i7.666

Tanjung, D. S. (2024). Model-Model Pembelajaran. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP, 7(4), 14713–14720. https://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id

Widiyono, A. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Quantum teaching Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 5(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v5i2.52593

Zed, M. (2008). Library Research Methods (2nd ed., p. 3). Indonesian Obor Library Foundation.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-05

How to Cite

Nazwa, S., Aziz, A. A., Sutioso, D., Agustina, E. E., & Azis, A. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Constructivist, Quantum, and Contextual Learning Models in Modern Education. El-Rusyd, 11(1), 156–166. https://doi.org/10.58485/elrusyd.v11i1.703

Issue

Section

Articles