Communication Ethics and Students’ Argumentative Skills in Islamic Higher Education

Authors

  • Muhammad Amirruddin Febriansyah Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
  • Nur Nihayati Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
  • Herlina Umi Fadila Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ghofur Triwijaya Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
  • Mahya Naila Taqiya Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58485/jie.v5i2.780

Keywords:

Communication, argumentative skills, communication ethics, Islamic higher education

Abstract

This study examines the role of communication in developing students’ argumentative skills in educational settings and public discussions. It aims to analyze the concept and role of communication, communication ethics in expressing opinions, and strategies for improving students’ communication and argumentative skills. This study employed a qualitative approach using content analysis. Data were obtained from relevant books, academic journal articles, and previous studies addressing communication, argumentation, communication ethics, and students’ argumentative skills. The data were analyzed through a process of identifying, categorizing, and interpreting recurring themes related to communication and argumentation. The findings reveal three main themes: i) the role of communication in developing argumentative skills, ii) communication ethics in expressing opinions, and iii) strategies for developing communication and argumentative skills. Communication was found to support logical and critical thinking, active listening, information literacy, confidence, and the ability to construct systematic arguments. Communication ethics were reflected in the use of respectful language, appreciation of different viewpoints, active listening, and responsible use of digital media. Meanwhile, the development of argumentative skills can be supported through public speaking practice, critical and logical thinking, literacy activities, discussions and debates, digital media use, self-evaluation, and a supportive academic environment. Overall, the findings indicate that effective argumentation requires an integration of communication skills, critical thinking, information literacy, ethical communication, and continuous practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afandi, I., Rahmawati, R., & Purliantoro, D. (2022). Hambatan Komunikasi Antara Mahasiswa Kkn Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung Dengan Masyarakat Desa Gajahmekar. Journal of Social and Economics Research, 4(2), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.54783/jser.v4i2.51

Alejandro, A., & Zhao, L. (2024). Multi-Method Qualitative Text and Discourse Analysis: A Methodological Framework. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(6), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231184421

Allsop, D. B., Chelladurai, J. M., Kimball, E. R., Marks, L. D., & Hendricks, J. J. (2022). Qualitative Methods with Nvivo Software: A Practical Guide for Analyzing Qualitative Data. Psych, 4(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych4020013

Ashour, M. L. (2018). Triangulation As a Powerful Methodological Research Technique in Technology-Based Services. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 6(1), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v6i1.209

Engkizar, E., Jaafar, A., Hamzah, M. I., Syafril, S., Ediz, M. H., Efendi, E., Ridha, A., Febriani, A., & Oktavia, G. (2026). Tartil Method as an Effective Pedagogical Approach for Enhancing Students’ Interest in Quranic Learning. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research of Higher Education (IJMURHICA), 9(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/ijmurhica.v9i1.637

Engkizar, E., Kasmar, I. F., Amnda, V., Mutathahirin, M., Maulida, A., Sari, W. W., Kaputra, S., Anwar, F., & Taufan, M. (2019). The Concepts of Mudarris, Mu’allim, Murabbi, Mursyid, Muaddib in Islamic Education. Khalifa: Journal of Islamic Education, 3(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.24036/kjie.v3i2.26

Engkizar, E., Muslim, H., Mulyadi, I., & Putra, Y. A. (2025). Ten Criteria for an Ideal Teacher to Memorize the Quran. Journal of Theory and Research Memorization Quran, 1(1), 26–39. https://joqer.intischolar.id/index.php/joqer

Evanne, L., Adli, A., & Ngalimun, N. (2021). Dampak Game Online terhadap Motivasi Belajar dan Keterampilan Komunikasi Interpersonal Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Sumatera Selatan. Al-KALAM JURNAL KOMUNIKASI, BISNIS DAN MANAJEMEN, 8(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-kalam.v8i1.4158

Gergen, K. J. . (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Overview of Data Reduction, Data Display and Interpretation. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(21), 1–100. https://doi.org/10.7176/RHSS/10-21-02

Gillies, R. M. (2019). Promoting academically productive student dialogue during collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.014

Gita, A., Insani, R., Herlanti, Y., Muliyah, E., Biologi, P., Syarif, U., Jakarta, H., & Selatan, K. T. (2024). Pengaruh Metode Debat Terhadap Keterampilan Berargumentasi Secara Tertulis pada Diskusi Isu Sosiosaintifik Keanekaragaman Hayati. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 1(1), 342–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v10i3.9453

Hasan, F., Tomikal, T., & Gilling, M. (2025). Six Academic Attitudes of Muslim Scholars Toward Knowledge Sources in the Digital Era. Muaddib: Journal of Islamic Teaching and Learning, 1(3), 109–122.

Kleinheksel, A. J., Rockich-Winston, N., Tawfik, H., & Wyatt, T. R. (2020). Demystifying Content Analysis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 7113. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7113

Kyngäs, H. (2020). Qualitative Research and Content Analysis. In The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research (Vol. 2, pp. 3–11). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_1

Lindgren, B.-M., Lundman, B., & Graneheim, U. H. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 108, 103632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632

Maharani, A. M., Andari, N. Z., & Suriani, A. (2025). Strategi Pembelajaran Kolaboratif SD Meningkatkan Keterampilan Sosial dan Keterlibatan Siswa. Journal Innovation In Education, 3(2), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.59841/inoved.v3i2.2846

Maisarah, A., Zulaiqah, N. A., Fitri, A., Hakiki, N., Mulyani, S., & Ritonga, S. (2025). Pengaruh Metode Diskusi Kelompok dan Debat Terhadap Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Mahasiswa. Edu Society: Jurnal Pendidikan, Ilmu Sosial Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v5i2.1163

Mukhlis, M., & Cahyadi, A. (2026). Islamic Digital Literacy and Character Formation in the Cyber Era: Integrating the Concepts of Adab, Akhlaq, and Social Media Ethics into a Digital-Based Islamic Education Curriculum. AL GHAZALI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran Islam, 6(2), 569–592. https://doi.org/10.69900/ag.v6i2.587

ÖZDEN, M. (2024). Content and Thematic Analysis Techniques in Qualitative Research: Purpose, Process and Features. Qualitative Inquiry in Education: Theory & Practice, 2(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.59455/qietp.20

Pohontsch, N. J. (2019). Qualitative Content Analysis. Rehabilitation (Germany), 58(6), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0801-5465

Preiser, R., García, M. M., Hill, L., & Klein, L. (2021). Qualitative content analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems (Vol. 58, Issue 06, pp. 270–281). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021339-23

Priastuty, C. W., Rochimah, H. A. I. N., & Pramana, P. (2023). Benturan Etika Komunikasi Di Tengah Pusaran Era Digital. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial, 7(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.38043/jids.v7i2.4917

Rahardhian, A. (2022). Kajian Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis (Critical Thinking Skill) Dari Sudut Pandang Filsafat. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 5(2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v5i2.42092

Renz, S. M., Carrington, J. M., & Badger, T. A. (2018a). Two Strategies for Qualitative Content Analysis: An Intramethod Approach to Triangulation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(5), 824–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317753586

Renz, S. M., Carrington, J. M., & Badger, T. A. (2018b). Two Strategies for Qualitative Content Analysis: An Intramethod Approach to Triangulation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(5), 824–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317753586

Sari, H. B., Ningsih, N. M. A. P. C., Kristina, N. M. Y., Rismayanti, N. P. I., Thalib, E. F., Meinarni, N. P. S., & Julianti, L. (2024). Digital Ethics and Citizenship Challenges in Cyberspace: an Overview From Perspective Morals and Laws. NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan, 9(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.9.1.2024.33-39

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Febriansyah, M. A., Nihayati, N., Fadila, H. U., Triwijaya, M. G., & Taqiya, M. N. (2026). Communication Ethics and Students’ Argumentative Skills in Islamic Higher Education. Ahlussunnah: Journal of Islamic Education, 5(2), 1028–1037. https://doi.org/10.58485/jie.v5i2.780

Issue

Section

Articles